|
COURT DECISIONS
More Pages >
1979 to 1987 |
1988 to 1993 |
1994 & 1995 |
1996 & 1997 |
1998 & 1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007
Links to websites for other
sources of court decisions:
Malaysia Court Homepage -
http://www.kehakiman.gov.my
Cases from Malaysia, Singapore and Other Jurisdictions -
http://www.ipsofactoj.com |
|
Cases - 2002 |
-
Matrix Momentum
Sdn Bhd v. Saratoga Sdn Bhd
10 JANUARY 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, JOHOR BAHRU
[CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-20-2001]
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary
judgment - Proper procedure - Mode of application - Facts deposed in affidavit
in Form 18 - Whether derived from plaintiff's solicitors - Whether facts ought
to be within deponent's personal knowledge - Whether O. 14 r. 2(1) of Rules of
the High Court 1980 complied with - Whether deposition could be admitted as
evidence
CONTRACT: Sale and purchase of property - Late delivery of vacant possession
- Sale and purchase agreement - Provision for liquidated damages for late
delivery of vacant possession - Whether plaintiff allowed to sue for damages
only - Whether time an essence of agreement - Whether plaintiff entitled to
rescind contract - Contracts Act 1950, s. 56
LAND LAW: Housing developers - Sale and purchase
agreement - Late delivery of vacant possession - Provision for liquidated
damages for late delivery of vacant possession - Whether plaintiff entitled to
rescind contract - Whether time an essence of agreement - Contracts Act 1950,
s. 56
-
Lim Chee
Holdings Sdn Bhd V RHB Bank Berhad
20 FEBRUARY 2002 - HIGH COURT (IPOH)
GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22-188-1994
Introduction:
These two cases were consolidated and tried together. The cause of action in
both the actions is basically breach of contract though, in the latter,
negligence is added. The facts involved are briefly as follows:
The plaintiff is a housing development company involved in developing a small
housing estate known as Taman Mewar (the project) in a minor town called
Langkap, which is between Telok Intan and Kapar, in Perak. The total project
consist of only 186 units of building which was to be made up of: 127 single
story houses; 52 double story houses and 7 double story shops.
-
Sakinas Sdn Bhd v. Siew Yik Hau & Anor
19 MARCH 2002 - HIGH COURT (KUALA LUMPUR)
CIVIL APPEAL NO R1-11-139 OF 2000
Civil Law Act
- Assignment - Whether deed of
assignment an absolute one or by way of charge only - Right of
assignor to sue - Whether necessary to join assignee - Civil Law Act
1956 s 4(3)
Contract - Breach - Performance of contract - Purchasers took vacant possession after agreed date of delivery of vacant possession - Whether purchasers had accepted performance of the developer's promise at a time other than the agreed date of delivery of vacant possession - Whether purchasers had to give developer notice of their intention to claim compensation for late delivery - Contracts Act 1950 s 56 (3)
Contract
- Damages - Liquidated damages - Damages for late delivery of vacant possession agreed to in sale and purchase agreement - Liquidated damages provided by legislation - Whether necessary for purchaser to adduce evidence of actual loss or damage suffered - Contracts Act 1950 s 75
Equity
- Assignment - Civil Law Act 1956 s 4(3) - Whether deed of assignment an absolute one or by way of charge only - Right of assignor to sue - Whether necessary to joint assignee
Land Law
- Housing developers - Damages for late delivery - Whether purchasers must prove actual damage of loss - Whether method of calculating liquidated damages as prescribed in Housing Developers (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 was incapable of overriding s 75 of Contracts Act 1950 - Reasonable compensation under s 75 of Contracts Act 1950 - Whether liquidated damages prescribed in Housing Developers (Control and Licensing) Regulations 1989 constituted reasonable compensation
-
Neoh Khoon
Lye- vs - Trans-Intan Sdn
Bhd
12 APRIL 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, PULAU PINANG
[CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-132-2001]
CONTRACT: Building
contract - Set-off - Whether right of set-off could be excluded by express
words or by implication - Whether claim for set-off proper and not premature -
Whether plaintiff entitled to set-off liquidated damages due to him against
final progressive payment due to defendant
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Injunction - Mandatory injunction - Application for
delivery of vacant possession of land - Balance of convenience - Whether
damages an adequate remedy - Whether there was a serious issue to be tried -
Whether case so "unusually sharp and clear" that injunction should be granted
-
Lim Ee Fah & Ors v. Seri Maju Padu
12 JULY 2002 - HIGH COURT OF MALAYA
[CIVIL APPEAL NO: MT(3) 11-3-1999]
LAND LAW:Housing
developers - Damages for late delivery - Agreement to deliver vacant
possession within 24 months - Date of vacant possession - Whether time to
commence from date of acceptance of deposit - Whether contract deemed to have
existed on receipt of deposit
CHIHARU YABE
(ZAUGG) & ANOR V. PENTADBIR TANAH WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN KUALA LUMPUR
05 AUGUST 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
[ORIGINATING MOTION NO: R1-25-39-2001]
LAND LAW: Restraint on dealings -
Restrictions in respect of non-citizens for purchase of property - Rejection
of application to purchase property - Bumiputera quota - Whether applicable
WORDS & PHRASES: "Bumiputera quota" - Garis Panduan Perolehan Tanah
oleh Warganegara Asing/Syarikat Asing 1998
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Time - Limitation to file appeal - National
Land Code, s. 418- Whether appeal filed beyond limitation period - Whether to
be dismissed
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Exercise of administrative powers - Discretion -
Restrictions in respect of non-citizens for purchase of property - National
Land Code, s. 433B - Requirement of approval from State Authority - Whether
discretion vested in Land Executive Committee - Rejection of application to
purchase property - Whether decision null and void
-
Tan Tien Seng & Ors v. Grobina Resorts Sdn Bhd
14 AUGUST 2002 - HIGH COURT [MELAKA]
SAMAN PEMULA NO. 24-537 TAHUN 2000
Dalam Perkara Perjanjian Jual Beli bertarikh 3 Januari 1995 berhubung
dengan harta yang dikenali sebagai Parcel No. 16- 01 of No. 01-Pent 7, Tanjung
Samudera Kondominium Beach Resort
"FOOTNOTE: The Court of Appeal on 5.11.07 affirmed the decision of
Justice Low Hop Bing at the Melaka High Court made in 2005. The developer's
appeal was dismissed with costs. The case is very important as it concerns
the right of a buyer to object to changes in a housing plan made without his
consent. The issues covered are:
1. to what extent can a developer make changes to the design of his
condominium without getting the consent of the buyers.
2. what constitutes fundamental breach of a sale and purchase agreement."
-
Chung May Yen v.
Puncakdana Development Sdn Bhd
20 SEPTEMBER 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
[ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: S6-24-1604-2001]
Contract:
Housing development contract - Breach - Delay in delivering vacant possession
of property - Whether caused by relevant authorities - Defence of waiver -
Whether defendant entitled - Whether purchaser entitled to terminate agreement
Land Law: Housing developers - Sale and purchase agreement -
Non-delivery of vacant possession - Whether delay caused by relevant
authorities - Whether plaintiff waived right to terminate agreement - Whether
plaintiff entitled to terminate agreement
-
Ng Weng Sum v. Lembah Beringin Sdn Bhd
21 SEPTEMBER 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
[ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: S6-24-1507-2001]
LAND LAW: Housing
developers - Sale and purchase agreement - Defendant failed to complete and
deliver vacant possession within stipulated time - Whether time was of essence
of contract - Whether plaintiff entitled to terminate agreement - Whether
defendant had established a good defence -Whether defendant had applied for
extension of time
-
Honour Properties Sdn Bhd &
Anor V. Duniaga Sdn Bhd
30 SEPTEMBER 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, PENANG
[COMPANIES WINDING UP NOS: 28-43-1997 & 28-51-1997]
COMPANY LAW: Winding-up
- Housing developer - Consent judgment - Consent judgment by creditors to
distribute progress payment payable to developer among themselves - Whether
ultra vires - Whether to be set aside for illegality - Progress payment
thereof - Whether to be remitted to developer's Housing Development Account -
Companies Act 1965 s. 221- Housing Developers (Control And Licensing ) Act
1966 ss. 7A, 24- Housing Developers (Housing Development Account) Regulations
1991 rr. 4, 7
-
Archlaw
Development Sdn Bhd v. Saw Ewe Leong
16 OCTOBER 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, PENANG
[ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: 22-298-2002]
The plaintiff is a housing developer and was at all material times
developing a housing project known as Rumah Pangsa Kos Rendah on Lots 1518,
1521, 816 and 824, Mukim 12, S.W.D., Daerah Barat Daya, Permatang Damar Laut,
Pulau Pinang.
-
Hariram Jayaram & Ors v. Sentul Raya Sdn Bhd
21 OCTOBER 2002 - HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
[ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: S5-24-1213-2002]
LAND LAW: Housing developers - Sale and purchase agreement -
Non-delivery of vacant possession - Damages - Claim for - Whether purchasers
prevented from claiming damages - Whether to rescind contract before making
claim -
Contracts Act 1950, s. 56(3)- Whether claim allowed under Housing
Developers (Control and Licensing) Act 1966
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: Cannons of construction - Generalia
specialibus non derogant - Sale and purchase of land agreement - Whether
Contracts Act 1950applicable - Whether
Housing Developers (Control and Licensing) Act 1966governing statute -
Whether specific laws ought to be applied as opposed to general legislation
CONTRACT: Housing development contract - Breach - Non-delivery of
vacant possession - Damages - Claim for - Notice to claim compensation -
Absence of - Whether purchasers prevented from claiming damages - Whether to
rescind contract before making claim -
Contracts Act 1950, s. 56(3)- Whether applicable
-
Sinwara Sdn Bhd V. Maris
Housing Sdn Bhd & Anor
26 NOVEMBER 2002 - HIGH COURT [KUALA LUMPUR]
SAMAN PEMULA NO: S6(S2)-24-3114-2001
Right to increase
the management fee, and if so, whether the Plaintiff must pay before strata
title is issued
-
Arab-Malaysian Finance Bhd v.
Steven Phoa Cheng Loon & Ors
03 DECEMBER 2002 - COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR
[CIVIL APPEAL NOS: W-01-68-2000, W-01-67-2000, W-01-69-2000 & W-02-602-2000]
Tort: Negligence - Collapse
of high-rise block of apartments - Loss in value of neighbouring blocks of
apartments - Appeal by defendants against liability - Whether defendants owed
a duty of care - Whether they breached duty - Whether there was causation -
Remoteness of damage - Pure economic loss - Whether recoverabel - Whether
recoverable if reasonably foreseeable
Civil Procedure: Pleadings - Departure from - Judge decided on issue
against defendant that was not raised in pleadings - Whether judge erred -
Whether defendants had, by conduct, entered upon issue during evidence and
argument - Whether defendants were not prejudiced
Tort: Negligence - Title to sue - Collapse of high-rise block of
apartments - Claim by residents/plaintiffs of neighbouring blocks for loss in
value - Whether they had title to sue - Whether possessory titles sufficient
Tort: Negligence - Local Authority - Breach of duty of care - Idemnity
- Whether s. 95(2) Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974 applicable - Whether
action barred by limitation
Tort: Nuisance - Failure to maintain drains - Failure thereof led to
landslide causign collapse of high-rise block of apartments - Whether a case
of actionable nuisance - Loss in value of neighbouring blocks of apartments -
Whether recoverable - Remoteness of damage - Whether test of reasonable
foreseeability
|
|
More Pages >
1979 to 1987 |
1988 to 1993 |
1994 & 1995 |
1996 & 1997 |
1998 & 1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007
|
|