Responsibility lies with developers  
			01/07/2005
			The Star   
			 
			WE READ your report, "RM3b to revive projects", (The Star, June 26), 
			with mixed feelings. We are happy that the Government has once again 
			displayed a caring attitude in allocating RM3bil to revive the more 
			then 170 abandoned housing schemes nationwide.
			Housing projects are abandoned due to a number of 
			reasons. Economic downturn is only one of them. Others include poor 
			management, poor feasibility studies (location, market demand, 
			affordability, etc), and in some cases, fraud (such as the 
			channeling of buyers' payments  towards other uses).
			 
			No amount of legislation can guarantee that there 
			will be no more projects being abandoned. The risks of conducting 
			business should rightly be borne by the proprietors in this case the 
			developers and their financial institutions.  
			House buyers should be insulated from such risks. 
			Yet the present mode of payment and delivery puts buyers squarely in 
			the risk equation. Not only do buyers carry a large proportion of 
			the finance required they also bear a large proportion of the 
			business risks over which they have absolutely no control.
			 
			Our Prime Minister had talked about the 
			build-and-sell concept to make sure buyers who pay money get their 
			houses.  
			Industry players are vehemently against such a 
			mode of house delivery. As much as we feel that this is the ideal 
			situation we also believe this will present a drastic paradigm, 
			shift; and the mindset is too big to breach.  
			However, an intermediate model is the 10-90 modes, 
			where buyers pay 10% upon signing the sale and purchase agreement 
			and the remaining 90% only upon completion of the houses.
			 
			In this way, developers can secure the number of 
			buyers and secure their own bridging financing before they start 
			building.  
			If there are delays, they carry the losses, not 
			the house buyers.  
			They will be compelled to build quality homes 
			because come full payment time, they will not want to risk getting 
			into disputes with buyers.  
			The situation will largely be self-regulating and 
			the Housing and Local Government Ministry can channel its efforts 
			towards more productive and meaningful subjects instead of 
			attempting to regulate and protect house buyers.  
			And certainly, public funds will not be needed to 
			bailout-failed housing projects because buyers will be insulated 
			against the devastating effects of such abandonment.  
			Only the developers and their financial 
			institutions are involved. The eventual goal should be for the 
			complete build then sell mode.  
			 
			CHANG KIM LOONG, 
			Secretary -General,
			National House Buyers
			Association,
			Kuala Lumpur.  
			(via e-mail)   |