Time for some answers
09/09/2008 Down 2 Earth, The Sun
BEFORE I begin, let me state that we have no issues with developers – as
long as they carry out their projects legally and ethically. And thank
goodness, there are still some of this dying breed of responsible
businessmen left in this country.
Now, the saga of cemetery land being sold to developers as was exposed in
theSun yesterday is nothing new.
It merely reflects a convention of how the capitalist former government in
Selangor had freely, by throwing the rule books out of the window, alienated
vast tracts of land meant for public use to bag carriers, bill settlers and
supporters.
It is also a testament of how some developers may have colluded with those
in the Land Office and even the State Executive Council to steal land from
rightful owners.
How else can you explain Damansara Jaya Development being asked to surrender
land for the purpose of a cemetery for a song, only to have the state
government sell the land to another developer for profit? Pay Damansara Jaya
RM3.25 million for the land and sell it to Metro Kajang Holdings for RM11.24
million – making a cool profit of RM7.99 million.
And while Damansara Jaya licks its wounds with its RM3.25 million
consolation, Metro Kajang through its subsidiary Cekap Corporation Bhd and
Nayaka (M) Sdn Bhd profit from the massive development of what was initially
burial ground – reaping RM60 million in profits in the process.
You do the maths. Why wouldn’t Damansara Jaya be pissed off?
And how did Nayaka come into the picture? One is perplexed as to why an
established developer like Metro Kajang, which at that time had 20 years in
the business, would do business with a company that showed RM6,000 loss in
1998. Ironically, the Companies Corporation of Malaysia does not have any
other financial records.
A close scrutiny of the joint venture agreement between Nayaka and Cekap
reveals Nayaka gets RM8 million plus 0.5% of the gross aggregate value of
the project (or RM2.5 million) for basically doing "bugger-all".
Am I wrong? Cekap undertakes the cost of the whole development; Cekap pays
the land premium to the state and Cekap provides a performance bond of RM1
million in favour of Nayaka for the 480 low-cost units it is to surrender to
the state.
What are Nayaka’s responsibilities? Execute a power of attorney to allow
Cekap full access to the cemetery land which Nayaka owns.
Wah! So much profit with zero investment! Like that, I also want, can or not
Mr Mentri Besar?
So how did Nayaka come into possession of cemetery land? That’s for the
state government to answer. All I can tell you is that if this does not reek
of rent-seeking, then you need to get your sense of smell checked.
I doubt this was what our past leaders had in mind when they drew up the New
Economic Policy.
And can anyone out there tell me who Nayaka directors and shareholders
Muhammad Nadzri Baharom and Kamarudin Mohd Idrus are and who they represent?
I don’t know them from Adam. I bet even the good folk at Metro Kajang really
do.
Perhaps Datuk Eddy Chen, group managing director of Metro Kajang and adviser
to the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (Rehda) can shed some
light. After all, it was he who told a forum on hillslope development two
weeks ago that he too would like to know how certain parcels of land were
alienated by the former state government and that he would support an
investigation by the Anti-Corruption Agency into the matter.
Perhaps Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim, Dr Xavier Jayakumar, Elizabeth Wong
and Derek Fernandez, who are investigating land alienation in Selangor,
would take the cue from Chen as they try to figure out how to return stolen
land to their rightful owners – be they alive or dead.
Terence is deputy editor (special reports & investigations) at theSun.
Feedback: terence@thesundaily.com
|