| Tribunal’s role in jeopardy The Star 13/1/2006
 ONE good thing that has happened to Malaysian consumers since 1999 is the 
    enactment of the Consumer Protection Act 1999.
 
 This Act has brought about the existence of the Consumer Claims Tribunal. 
    Consumers now have access to a cheap and speedy avenue to seek redress.
 
 Before 1999, consumers would have to go through lengthy judicial litigation 
    over small consumer matters but now, they would be able to solve their 
    problem against businesses within 60 days of filing of a claim, which would 
    only cost them RM5.
 
 If previously consumers would refrain from taking small claims to civil 
    courts, they would now be able to freely do so. There should be no reason 
    for consumers to keep silent if they are being short-changed by businesses 
    as the tribunal can hear claims for up to RM25,000.
 
 Though the tribunal plays an important role in helping consumers, its 
    effectiveness has always been questioned.
 
 This is due to the shocking revelation by the media that there were 954 
    cases of non-compliance recorded between 2001 and Dec 31 last year.
 
 What is the use of passing an award if it is not complied with? The Consumer 
    Protection Act 1999 has clothed the enforcement division with strong 
    enforcement powers to enforce these awards but how many of the errant 
    traders have been booked?
 
 Also, till today, we have not seen or heard of any company being taken to 
    court and charged with failure to comply.
 
 Apart from these shortcomings, the tribunal decisions are so inconsistent 
    that consumers are sometimes left puzzled.
 
 Each tribunal president interprets the facts to his own understanding, which 
    results in identical cases being judged differently.
 
 The tribunal presidents are required to provide written grounds of decisions 
    but most of them do not. It is important to provide written judgments as the 
    tribunal award is final and it can only be challenged via judicial review in 
    the High Court. If serious attention is not given to the tribunal, it will 
    soon lose its credibility.
 
 DARSHAN SINGH,
 Manager, National
 Consumer Complaints Centre,
 Petaling Jaya.
 |