Responsibility lies with developers
01/07/2005
The Star
WE READ your report, "RM3b to revive projects", (The Star, June 26),
with mixed feelings. We are happy that the Government has once again
displayed a caring attitude in allocating RM3bil to revive the more
then 170 abandoned housing schemes nationwide.
Housing projects are abandoned due to a number of
reasons. Economic downturn is only one of them. Others include poor
management, poor feasibility studies (location, market demand,
affordability, etc), and in some cases, fraud (such as the
channeling of buyers' payments towards other uses).
No amount of legislation can guarantee that there
will be no more projects being abandoned. The risks of conducting
business should rightly be borne by the proprietors in this case the
developers and their financial institutions.
House buyers should be insulated from such risks.
Yet the present mode of payment and delivery puts buyers squarely in
the risk equation. Not only do buyers carry a large proportion of
the finance required they also bear a large proportion of the
business risks over which they have absolutely no control.
Our Prime Minister had talked about the
build-and-sell concept to make sure buyers who pay money get their
houses.
Industry players are vehemently against such a
mode of house delivery. As much as we feel that this is the ideal
situation we also believe this will present a drastic paradigm,
shift; and the mindset is too big to breach.
However, an intermediate model is the 10-90 modes,
where buyers pay 10% upon signing the sale and purchase agreement
and the remaining 90% only upon completion of the houses.
In this way, developers can secure the number of
buyers and secure their own bridging financing before they start
building.
If there are delays, they carry the losses, not
the house buyers.
They will be compelled to build quality homes
because come full payment time, they will not want to risk getting
into disputes with buyers.
The situation will largely be self-regulating and
the Housing and Local Government Ministry can channel its efforts
towards more productive and meaningful subjects instead of
attempting to regulate and protect house buyers.
And certainly, public funds will not be needed to
bailout-failed housing projects because buyers will be insulated
against the devastating effects of such abandonment.
Only the developers and their financial
institutions are involved. The eventual goal should be for the
complete build then sell mode.
CHANG KIM LOONG,
Secretary -General,
National House Buyers
Association,
Kuala Lumpur.
(via e-mail) |