Building trust
NST Editorial 23/03/2005
Mar 23:
DELAYS in getting the Certificate of Fitness for Occupation (CFO) will
become a thing of the past by the end of the year not because the local
authorities responsible for issuing them will have become super efficient
by then, but through the simple yet radical expedient of doing away with
it altogether.
This elimination of the necessity of getting
certification from a local authority before a building can be legally
occupied is the kind of bold move that is required if progress is to be
made in cutting down red tape.
Discontinuing unnecessary procedures or removing the need for needless
official authorisation is certainly one of the most direct and effective
ways of reducing bureaucracy, and of eradicating the opportunity for
corrupt practices.
In the case of the CFO, many administrative reforms have been attempted in
the past to address grouses over the protracted delays. House buyers have
long complained that it can take anything from six months to two years,
and sometimes even longer, to get one. To speed up its issue, in 1996 the
Cabinet directed all local authorities to give it out within 14 days.
When even that didn’t seem to make things any better, amendments were made
to the law in 2002, and at the end of 2003, the Housing and Local
Government Minister Datuk Seri Ong Ka Ting announced the removal of seven
agencies from the CFO process as well as the setting-up of a one-stop
centre to expedite approvals. Not content with that, in June last year,
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi directed the Housing and
Local Government Ministry to study the possibility of abolishing the CFO
and replacing it with self-certification by professionals in the building
industry.
The Prime Minister had said then that the Government would not rush
through the proposal and would only proceed once everything was ready so
that the interests of house-buyers would be protected and the safety of
buildings would not be compromised. Even those who have grave doubts about
self-certification must concede that the Government has kept its word
about not acting in haste. Not only has it taken more than one year for
the idea to be implemented, but the Government has also held wide-ranging
discussions with the key players.
It is hoped the the Housing and Local Government Ministry has done its
homework well to ensure that the new Certificate of Completion and
Compliance issued by the professional bodies complies with the Uniform
Building By-Laws.
While there should be appropriate laws against false certification, the
onus is on self-regulation by the professional associations. They need to
tighten discipline to prevent violations of the building by-laws and the
codes of professional conduct.
Architects and engineers should remember that while they have a duty to
their clients, they also have a public trust to deliver buildings that are
fit and safe for occupation. |