They're not all rogues, says
Rehda
NST 19/11/2005
While welcoming the Housing and Local Government Ministry’s naming of
developers that have flouted the housing development law and regulations,
the Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (Rehda) said it is not
fair to brand all companies in the list as "rogue developers".
Its president, Datuk Jeffrey Ng Tiong Lip, said earlier this week that while
Rehda supported efforts by the Enforcement and Control Division to strictly
enforce the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966, there
should be "a distinction between the majority (that) were compounded for
slight technical offences and the very few that committed serious breaches
against house buyers".
The ministry in the middle of last month posted the names of 695 developers
on its website (www.kpkt.gov.my), against which action was taken for various
breaches of the law, or against which action in court is pending.
Five lists have been posted. One names 213 developers that have been fined
RM1, 000 each (and another company filled RM2, 000) between 2003 and
September this year for breaching conditions or restrictions related to
advertising in their housing development licenses. Among them are a number
of better-known developers.
A third list reveals 304 developers, prominent compares included, that have
been fined RM10, 000 each, also between 2003 and September this year, for
failing to submit biannual reports on the progress of their developments.
These reports are required by the ministry to diagnose the status of housing
projects and to consider the action to take if there is indication that a
project may fail or be abandoned.
The other lists name 15 firms that were prosecuted for failing to comply
with awards handed down by the Tribunal for Homebuyers Claims, and five
others that had been fined, or against which court action is pending for
offences ranging from illegally using the term "housing developer" to
failing to provide information required by the Controller of Housing.
Ng said releasing the names of offenders in the website is "clear
indication" of the seriousness of the ministry in ensuring compliance on the
part of developers in order to protect the interests of house buyers.
However, he said it is "unfair to brand the majority of these (firms) as
'rogue' developers, especially when the offenders listed include those that
have been publicly recognized and awarded for successfully completing
thousands of houses to buyers' satisfaction".
"Listing them in public for offences of such nature casts unfair aspersions
on their reputation, implying that they have caused harm to house buyers in
the process," he said.
Ng added that while Rehda fully supports the ministry in its efforts towards
a transparent system of enforcement,” public censure of offences must
discern between minor technical infractions as opposed to those that have
caused major hardship and detriment to buyers". |