Prevention is better than cure
NST 5/11/2004 By Editorial
THERE was a time when busy construction sites were a source of
pride, employment and profit, What wasn’t obvious then was the
flipside of all that overbuilding, which many suspected would appear
once the shine on the sub-standard surfaces wore off. True enough,
cracks are starting to show up in the country’s vaunted
infrastructure.Some can be attributed to a
"failure rate" that went with the frantic pace of development.
Others, however, are less easily papered over. Buildings have been
found to be crumbling soon after they are occupied; some even before
they are completed. School computer labs have exemplified the
latter, with the added embarrassment of the ministry concerned not
having the funds in hand to make repairs. More than red faces should
result from the latest discovery of structural defects in 16 schools
and five colleges, most of them newly built. Some might have to be
closed, one demolished.
With the Government as the developer, taxpayers will eventually have
to foot the bill, not to mention the disruption caused to the
affected students. Calls for the Works Minister to resign may seem
misdirected and unfair, if only because he is not solely responsible
for the train of events leading to the buck stopping at his desk.
But that is where the buck nevertheless stops, whether he likes it
or not. Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has
instructed the Public Works Department to report on the defects.
Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu has undertaken to get to the bottom of the
matter. If the faults are not his department’s, then he must find
out whose they are. He must also find out if they were slipshod,
negligent or criminal. The Works Minister echoed public opinion when
he said: "Now we have to find out who the contractor is. Who is the
consultant engineer?"
Such questions, if answered, will remove the scent of corruption
that hangs in the air as long as the Government is slow to act. To
be fair, the slowness isn’t all due to inertia or lack of will. Few
contractors have ended up being sanctioned for shoddy work, mainly
because it may not be worthwhile to send them into bankruptcy in a
vain effort to exact compensation. Builders and developers also have
considerable economic clout and are adept at minimising their
exposure to risk and future liability. They are central to the
Government’s earnest desire to aid small industries, which induces a
reluctance to impose conditions and caveats that could put them out
of business.
A slowness to act, even in the best intentions, will mean that the
defective buildings in the 16 schools and five colleges won’t be the
last. At the very minimum, the investigation should drive one more
nail into the coffin of untendered, no-bid contracts. But should
such preferences be maintained, the Government must ensure that
proponents have responsible track records and, at least, will be
easy to locate when things go bad. |