Common area
maintenance
NST 27/11/2004
LOCAL authorities have reacted to a call by some developers that wish to
take over the maintenance of common areas in their developments - on
grounds that such work is now shoddily done - by inviting them to submit
tenders "through the proper procedures".
These
developers, who recently voiced their concerns about the poor quality of
maintenance and upkeep services provided, have suggested that they take on
the job themselves as a possible solution to what they see as "a growing
problem".
Most local authorities at present sub-contract the
cleaning up and common area maintenance of neighbourhoods under their
jurisdiction to private firms - some of which developers have accused of
being "negligent" in the removal of refuse, in matters pertaining to
keeping the greenery neat and overseeing the general upkeep of sidewalks
and other common areas.
Responding to this, two local councils contacted said
that if developers are unhappy about this situation and are serious about
taking on these responsibilities, they were more than welcome to submit
tenders for consideration.
"However, it must be remembered that Government bodies
have strict guidelines to meet before awarding contracts. Developers
cannot be favoured just because they developed the locality.
"Any bid to provide local services must be made by open
tender and contracts are awarded on a fair merit basis to the most
appropriate bid,"
Majlis Perbandaran Selayang's public relations officer
Mohd Zin Masaod said. He said "meeting Government guidelines" meant that
the person or firm submitting the bid must have a Class F contractor's
licence, as well as adhere to several other Government prerequisites.
Majlis Perbandaran Subang Jaya's (MPSJ) senior public
relations officer Azfarizal Abdul Rashid said local authorities generally
enjoyed a good relationship with developers in their jurisdiction and
would be open to any suggestion they had on providing a better
environment.
"We understand that some developers, particularly those
involved in upmarket projects, may demand higher standards for their
developments, resulting in a desire to handle (and perhaps invest more) in
maintenance.
We are open to ideas to improve these services."
However, Azfarizal said, contractors tasked with the job now could not
simply be dismissed or replaced.
Complaints of shoddy performance against them must first
be investigated. If the complaints are genuine, the contractor is given a
chance to improve the performance before a decision is made to terminate
the contract and source for new contractors.
Dismissing allegations that local councils do not
monitor the work of cleaning and maintenance contractors properly,
Azfarizal said the Government requires all councils to enforce stringent
monitoring and evaluation guidelines, as well as set up a channel to
receive complaints from the public.
"MPSJ works on a demerit system, whereby it regularly
evaluates the performance of its contractors. Should complaints be lodged
against a contractor, or if we find that the job is not up to standard,
the first penalty is to cut a percentage of its remuneration package. If
the contractor continues to provide questionable service, we will then
terminate the contract," he said.
Local authorities, he added, have easily accessible
complaint centres that developers should be well aware of, which are
usually managed by their public relations departments. |