| 
    Real property 
    gains tax and the executor 25/08/2006 The Sun - Law & Realty By Yang Pei Keng
 
 The real property gains tax (“gains tax”) is a form of tax that you have to 
    pay when you sell any landed property, for example, a residential house, a 
    shophouse (including a shoplot, an apartment and a flat). No gains tax is 
    payable if you buy a landed property.
 
 In other words, the Real Property Gains Tax Act 1976 (the “RPGT Act”) only 
    applies to the sale, but not the purchase of any landed property.
 
 The executor is the person (named in a will) who administers the estate 
    (that is, the property) of a deceased.
 
 RPGT introduced in 1975
 
 No gains tax was payable up to the end of 1975. It was introduced by the 
    RPGT Act on 7 November 1975
 
 The RPGT Act was enacted to replace the Speculation Tax Act (since 
    repealed). The Speculation Tax Act was supposed to be a temporary measure to 
    fight speculation in landed property during the boom period in the 
    seventies.
 
 It was found to be a good source of revenue. The RPGT Act was then passed to 
    perpetuate the tax on sale of land in the form of gains tax. Gains tax has 
    since been payable for the past 30 years.
 
 Date of acquisition
 
 There are numerous aspects of the RPGT Act that need to be discussed. In 
    this article, only one of the aspects is touched upon, that is, the date of 
    acquisition of the property.
 
 In order to compute any gains tax payable on the sale of a property, one has 
    to ascertain the date of acquiring the property, that is, the date of 
    acquisition.
 
 Generally, the date of acquisition is the date the property was bought. 
    However, in certain cases, the date of acquiring the property may not be 
    that easily ascertained, for example, the date of acquisition by an executor 
    of the estate of a deceased person.
 
 Date of acquisition by executor
 
 An executor does not acquire the estate of the deceased in the strict sense 
    of the word. He does not acquire any interest in the property belonging to 
    the estate of the deceased. He is merely an agent holding the property on 
    behalf of the estate of the deceased, pending distribution of the property 
    to its beneficiaries.
 
 He may sell or dispose of the estate of the deceased before distributing it 
    to the beneficiaries. The question is: What is the “date of acquisition” of 
    a property by an executor (or an administrator), bearing in mind that he did 
    not buy the property, but the deceased bought it.
 
 The man in the street may take the date the deceased purchased the property 
    as the date of acquisition by the executor. However, it is not so. The law 
    has arbitrarily fixed the date of acquisition by an executor.
 
 Date of death of the deceased
 
 The RPGT Act takes the date of death of the deceased to be the date of 
    acquisition by the executor, that is: date of death of the deceased = date 
    of acquisition by executor.
 
 The actual date the deceased bought the property (which could be many years 
    before his death) is not to be taken into account, even though the executor 
    steps into the shoes of the deceased when managing the deceased’s estate.
 
 The date of death of the deceased is deemed to be the date of acquisition of 
    the executor. This was the result of an amendment by the Finance Act (No.2) 
    1985, s39(g) to the RPGT Act. It took effect on 1 January 1986. A new 
    paragraph 15B(1) was added to Schedule 2 of the Act:
 
 “15B(1) Where an asset of a deceased person is disposed of (otherwise than 
    to a legatee i.e.beneficiary) by his executor ..., such executor ... shall 
    be deemed to have acquired it on the date of death of the deceased person."
 
 According to this paragraph, the executor is taken to have acquired the 
    property on the date of death of the deceased. The actual date the deceased 
    bought the property is irrelevant. It may be much earlier than his date of 
    death. An illustration may help:
 
 In 2000, the deceased bought the property. In 2005, the deceased died. In 
    2006, the executor sold the property.
 
 In the illustration given, the executor is deemed to have acquired the 
    property in 2005 when the deceased died, but not in the year 2000 when he 
    actually bought the property. The actual date the deceased bought the 
    property was not taken into account.
 
 The executor sold the property in 2006. He has to pay gains tax at the rate 
    of 30% of the gain. That is the highest rate of the sliding scale of gains 
    tax payable when a landed property is sold one year after the death of the 
    deceased.
 
 For example, if the gain in disposing of the property was RM100,000, the 
    gains tax payable would be RM30,000.
 
 If the date the deceased bought the property is taken into account, no gains 
    tax is payable, since any sale of property after 5 years (2000 -1006) is not 
    subject to gains tax.
 
 Is the provision introduced to frustrate any attempt by the beneficiaries to 
    avoid payment of RPGT by way of selling the property of the deceased before 
    the distribution of the estate to the beneficiaries concerned?
 
 Date of transmission to executor
 
 There is another point which is worthy of note. When the property was 
    transmitted (i.e. 'transferred') into the name of the executor, the date of 
    transmissioin is not taken as the date of acquisition of the executor 
    either, if he sells the property.
 
 The writer is a member of the Conveyancing Practice Committee, Bar Council 
    Malaysia, www.malaysianbar.org.my
 |