10:90 isn't a Build-Then-Sell
system
NST 12/08/2006 Published in NST-PROP
A Buyer Watch Article by National House Buyers
Association
It's actually an interim solution
to protect buyers
Since the Government introduced
the 10:90 concept for housing delivery, there have been mountains of news
referring to it as Build-Then-Sell (BTS) system. But they've all got it
wrong.
Maybe it's because Malaysians are so used to the current method of
developers selling, then building houses that any deviation such as 10:90
appears like the total opposite. Maybe it's because we are all desperate for
a solution that can put an end to the problems caused by the Sell-Then-Build
(BTS) that we hope the 10:90 can be a type of BTS. Whatever the case, it's
time to clear up any misunderstanding or confusion.
As a quick recap, with BTS,
developers can only sell their houses after they have been completed.
Because of this, developers adopting the method need not apply for the
requisite Developer Licence or Advertising and Sales Permit in order to sell
their units, and also don't need to adhere to the standard Sale and Purchase
Agreements as spelt out in the Housing Development Act.
In this sense, the 10:90 concept announced by the Government is not a true
BTS system - it is actually a model that sits midway between the present STB
method involving the progressive payments and the complete BTS system.
As such, it can be described as a variant of either STB or BTS, or even a
"Deferred Payment" method. It matters little. To portray it accurately, we
prefer to term it the "10:90 concept".
What is important is to understand the mechanics. As the interim
solution that can remove a large amount of risk from buyers so they won't
end up either being stuck in an abandoned project or owning a shoddily built
unit, the 10:90 concept allows buyers to pay a 10 per cent deposit to
lock-in their purchase.
The remaining 90 per cent of the purchase price is only payable upon
completion of their houses together with the issuance of Certificates of
Fitness for Occupation.
Until that time, the 10 per cent paid is held by a lawyer acting as a
stakeholder.
Since with the 10:90 concept houses wouldn't have been completed yet,
(unlike BTS), buyers would not be able to physically inspect their units
before signing on the dotted line and purchase would still be based on
developer's brochures and advertisements, as is currently practised.
However, its big difference with STB is that should the developer for
whatever reason abandon the project, its buyers would be insulated from the
disastrous fallout.
Obviously, with the introduction of the 10:90 concept, a new standard Sale
and Purchase Agreement is required. In this respect, the Legal Committee of
the National House Buyers Association has proactively crafted what it should
look like, together with two new schedules of payment for landed and
stratified properties.
We have already forwarded the proposed agreement to Ministry of Housing and
Local Government secretary-general Datuk Ahmad Fuad, and will discuss our
proposal next week.
|